Revolution will lead to a new national regime, but universalization will
guide us to the new prospective prosperous progressive perspectives that nobody
was bold and goodier enough to go before us.
So, from revolution to the universalization is a righteous historical way.
The divine universalism as a next phase of development after mundane
capitalism.
A guide of the universalization is Zikalkis Tu Ungulavius Gradualius. He is
not religious god yehallah ( an almighty god ). He is a secular god, or
civilization's Ilah...extracted and excerpted from other ilahs ( helpers ) but
not hijacked by priests as Allah....he remained peoples god (The God), not
priests god .... universally for benefits of all .....let us put it in prospect
and plan the plans...Oprah, Bill, Warren, Soros are helpers-gods/lords ( ilahs
) too, but they are limited in capacity and capabilities to deliver for all
people, so we have to eclect one of those ilahs to be Ilah ( The God ) to whom
we shall attribute 145th attribute of gods and it is GDP ( Gross Domestic Product
) in value of one zillion .... there is I am, and here you are, first choice is
me...Zikalkis...i am The God ( Ilah ) ( only god with paradigm who made itself
) and ( only god with universal name and email address ) and ( only god that
says that he is the god and declared his paradigm ) until you elect an other
ilah ( a god ) to be Ilah ( The God ) or ( secular Allah )....religions have
also extracted a god to be the god but not The God, The God is secular because
it is functional and factual not axiomatic and asumptive as the gods of
religions are...
So we have: the helpers-gods (ilahs), the almighty god (s)
(YehAllah-BudhAtman) and The Secular God (Zikalkis), who is connecting and
realizing them.
Or ; helpers-ilahs, Allah and Ilah (Zikalkis) ( so Allah is greatest of all
allahs and Zikalkis is Ilah, goodiest of all Ilahs)
We say:
Assumptive pretensions ( of religions ) vs./& Assumed presumption ( of
The God Zikalkis )
Zikalkis's budget is making things not making things up or making things up
to
they have national sovereignties but not individual sovereignties
so they make their mind in pannational conservative far right extremes.
English is
indispensable language for the universalising, other languages can't be of use
in this matter .... but neither british english nor american english but UNIVERSAL
ENGLISH. It is universal heritage and provident property.
So, they should
consider english as their own language. But people of the world don't think
about it. I have to tell them, one by one.
liberating and
liberalisation <> universalising and universalisation
bye .... zikalkinho
....
No comments:
Post a Comment